HIRE DEVELOPERS / ELECTRON DEVELOPERS
Wrapping a webpage in Electron is the easy 10%. The other 90% is IPC design, native OS integration, and getting auto-updates right across Windows, macOS, and Linux — the part where most "Electron developers" fall apart. Ours don't. We provide Electron development services built on production apps already running in front of thousands of real users.
Anyone can put a website inside a window. Fewer people can get the memory footprint, the update pipeline, and the OS integration right once real users are on the other end — that gap is where our Electron developers actually earn the hire.
A generic interview asks about JavaScript. Ours asks how you'd design IPC between main and renderer, where you'd expect a memory leak to hide, and what native API you'd reach for first — the questions where most "Electron" resumes fall apart.
The average tech hire eats six weeks of interviews neither side likes. We compress that to a scoping call and a shortlist of developers who've actually shipped Electron before — someone can start this week, not after a fourth interview round.
Some Electron work needs a senior engineer parachuted in for two weeks. Some needs a person embedded for a year. We size the engagement to match instead of selling you the same package regardless of what you actually need.
Every option here is Electron staff augmentation — tell us the scope, we'll tell you the hours that actually fit it.
One Electron developer, in your standups, following your process, with zero attention split across another client's codebase. The model for a desktop product you're actively building and iterating on, not patching occasionally.
Twenty hours a week is enough to keep desktop work moving without paying for a developer's full attention — right for teams bolting Electron onto an existing product or pushing through one specific milestone.
Sometimes the ask isn't a developer, it's an answer — why this app is slow, why an IPC channel broke, how to wire in a native module. Hourly blocks exist for exactly that, billed only for the problem actually solved.
Match the model to how your team is already set up, or tell us and we'll pick for you.
Hand us the keys and we own architecture, IPC design, the auto-update pipeline, and every signed release. Your job turns into reviewing progress, not running the build.
Your engineering lead already knows how to run a build. What's missing is someone who's actually shipped Electron before — this model drops that person straight into your existing workflow, reporting to your lead, held to your bar.
Split the work by what each side is good at. Your team keeps the product roadmap and business logic; our specialist owns what's genuinely Electron-specific — IPC, code-signing, auto-update, native modules.
A web engineer who never learned Electron's specific failure modes builds an app that leaks memory and breaks on macOS notarization. Ours came up through web and systems engineering both — the actual combination this framework demands.
The framework itself: Chromium and Node.js fused into one runtime. It's what Discord, Slack, and VS Code are actually built on, not a toy wrapper around a website.
The default choice for Electron renderer UIs, component-driven and familiar to most engineers we bring in.
A lighter option when the renderer doesn't need React's overhead.
The pick when an Electron UI is genuinely complex enough to earn its full structure.
Adjacent services we often ship alongside Electron work — same bench, same standards.
Questions we get on every first call about hiring Electron developers. Yours isn't here? It'll be the first thing we cover.
Describe what you're building and what's slowing it down. We'll tell you honestly whether it's an Electron problem, a hiring problem, or both — then help fix whichever one it actually is.
