Salesforce built to scale,not just configured.

Salesforce development services for teams that have outgrown declarative configuration. Custom Apex for business logic that Flow can't handle. Lightning Web Components for UIs that don't look like default Salesforce. MuleSoft integrations that actually keep your systems in sync. We build on Salesforce with the engineering rigour the platform deserves — not the point-and-click shortcuts that break at scale.

  • LWC
  • Apex
  • MuleSoft
  • DevOps Center

Why Entalogics for Salesforce

Four things every
Salesforce org
actually needs.

The Salesforce orgs we inherit have the same problems — 200 Flows that nobody can trace, Apex triggers with zero test coverage, Lightning pages still using Aura components from 2018, and integrations held together by middleware nobody maintains. The platform is powerful. Most implementations don't use it properly.

Architecture01

Apex where it earns it. Flows where they belong.

Flow for admin-maintained automation. Apex for complex business logic, bulk processing, and integrations. The two aren't interchangeable — and treating them that way creates maintenance nightmares that neither admins nor developers can fix.

UI02

Lightning Web Components, not Aura in 2026.

LWC is Salesforce's modern UI framework — faster, standards-based, and better supported. We build custom LWC components that look and behave like the UI your users actually want, not the default record pages they work around.

Integration03

MuleSoft or typed APIs. Not point-to-point middleware chaos.

REST callouts with typed Apex classes. MuleSoft for complex multi-system orchestration. Named Credentials for secure authentication. Every integration monitored, logged, and retryable — not a scheduled job that silently fails.

Type safety04

Typed DTOs, typed callouts, 85%+ meaningful test coverage.

No `Map<String, Object>` passed between classes. Typed data transfer objects at every boundary. Test classes that assert behaviour — not just hit coverage numbers. Governor limit-safe by construction.

When Salesforce, when not

Salesforce is a platform.
Not a silver bullet.

Salesforce handles CRM, CPQ, service, and marketing better than almost anything. It's also expensive, opinionated, and genuinely complex to extend properly. We'll tell you on the first call if custom Salesforce development is the right path.

BUILD CUSTOM ON SALESFORCE WHEN

  • Your CRM data is the centre of the business and Salesforce already owns it
  • Complex business rules need Apex — approval chains, pricing logic, multi-object automation
  • Your users live in Salesforce all day and need custom LWC interfaces that match their workflows
  • Enterprise integrations need a governed API layer, not spreadsheet imports

CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES WHEN

  • You need a custom web application that happens to use CRM data — a headless API + Next.js may be simpler
  • Licensing costs exceed the value Salesforce adds — for small teams, HubSpot or a custom CRM costs less
  • Your development team doesn't include Salesforce specialists — the learning curve is real

WE SAY NO WHEN

  • "Salesforce for a startup with 5 users." You don't need the cost or the complexity yet.
  • "Just add more Flows until it works." That's how you get 200 Flows nobody can debug.
  • "Custom Salesforce app in two weeks." That ship has sailed.

What we build on Salesforce

Six product surfaces.
One quality bar.

The shapes of Salesforce development work we deliver most. Each built for production orgs — not sandbox demos.

  • S01

    Custom Apex business logic

    Triggers, services, batch jobs, and scheduled classes built with proper separation of concerns. Governor limit-safe. Bulkified. 85%+ test coverage that tests behaviour, not just lines.

    APEXTRIGGERSBATCH JOBSTESTNG
  • S02

    Lightning Web Component development

    Custom LWC interfaces — dashboards, data tables, multi-step forms, embedded analytics. Components that look like your product, not like default Salesforce.

    LWCAPEX CONTROLLERSLIGHTNING DESIGNJEST
  • S03

    Salesforce integrations

    REST/SOAP callouts, MuleSoft orchestration, Platform Events for real-time sync, Named Credentials for auth. Every integration monitored and retryable.

    MULESOFTREST APIPLATFORM EVENTSNAMED CREDENTIALS
  • S04

    AppExchange product development

    ISV apps built for security review. Managed packages, namespaced code, LWC-first interfaces, multi-org compatibility. Passing AppExchange review on the first submission.

    MANAGED PACKAGESISVSECURITY REVIEWLWC
  • S05

    Salesforce DevOps & CI/CD

    Source-driven development with SFDX, Git, and DevOps Center. Automated deployments, scratch orgs for testing, and metadata tracked in version control — not deployed manually.

    SFDXDEVOPS CENTERGITHUB ACTIONSSCRATCH ORGS
  • S06

    Legacy Salesforce modernisation

    Aura to LWC, Workflow Rules to Flow, unstructured Apex to service layers. Component by component — the current org keeps running while we modernise.

    LWCFLOWAPEX REFACTORSFDX

The playbook

Patterns we
ship on repeat.

Salesforce patterns from real production orgs — not Trailhead badges.

  • P01

    Service layer pattern for Apex

    Business logic in service classes. Triggers call services, services call selectors. No logic in triggers. No SOQL in controllers. Testable and refactorable.

  • P02

    LWC with wire and imperative Apex

    Wire for reactive data. Imperative calls for user actions. Cached results where appropriate. No Aura in new development.

  • P03

    Named Credentials for every callout

    No hardcoded endpoints or credentials in Apex. Named Credentials manage auth, endpoints, and certificates. Rotatable without code changes.

  • P04

    Platform Events for real-time sync

    Publish/subscribe for cross-system events. Retry logic on subscribers. Event monitoring in production. No polling.

  • P05

    85%+ meaningful test coverage

    Test classes assert behaviour and bulk scenarios — not just line coverage. Negative tests included. Governor limit tests on batch jobs.

  • P06

    SFDX source-driven development

    All metadata in Git. Scratch orgs for development. CI/CD deploying to sandboxes and production. No manual deployments via change sets.

Signature case

A sales org,
rebuilt from Workflow chaos to structured Apex + LWC.

A B2B sales organisation with 340 Workflow Rules, 89 Process Builders, Aura components on every page, and an Apex codebase with 42% test coverage — all running on Classic. Migrated to Lightning with LWC, consolidated automations into structured Flows and Apex services, raised test coverage to 91% in 10 weeks. Without a feature freeze.

Before

Classic · 340 Workflows + 89 Process Builders · Aura components · 42% test coverage

After

Lightning · 28 Flows + Apex services · LWC components · 91% meaningful test coverage

  • Automation rules429 → 28 + services
  • Test coverage42% → 91%
  • To fully modernised10wk
  • Shipped regressions0

Engagement shape

Eight to ten weeks
to a measurable ship.

A typical Salesforce development engagement. We build or modernise component by component — the current org keeps running while we work.

  • W01

    Audit + RFC

    Two senior Salesforce developers. Apex coverage review, automation inventory, LWC audit, integration health check. A ranked, dollarized RFC.

  • W02–03

    Foundation + first component

    SFDX project baseline, service layer pattern established, first LWC or Apex service built end-to-end. Deployed to sandbox with tests passing.

  • W04–08

    Component by component

    LWC pages, Apex services, integrations — each deployed and tested. The current org keeps running throughout.

  • W09+

    Production deployment + handoff

    Full deployment to production. CI/CD wired. Runbook handed to your team — or we stay on retainer.

Stack

Tools we
reach for first.

Our default Salesforce development stack — picked for production orgs.

  • BackendApex · Triggers · Batch · Scheduled · Platform Events
  • FrontendLightning Web Components · Lightning Design System · SLDS
  • IntegrationMuleSoft · REST/SOAP · Named Credentials · External Services
  • DevOpsSFDX · DevOps Center · GitHub Actions · Scratch Orgs
  • TestingApex Test Framework · Jest (LWC) · PMD · ApexPMD
  • ToolsVS Code + SF Extensions · Data Loader · Workbench · Inspector

Engagement

Three ways
to work with us.

No hourly retainer that bills for "thinking time." Pick a lane that matches your stage; everything is fixed-quote or transparently rated.

FIXED SCOPEone-off build

Ship a Salesforce project, end-to-end.

A defined scope, a fixed price, a senior-only team. From RFC to production deployment in 8–14 weeks.

$15k–$30k

FIXED SCOPE

  • Senior engineers only
  • Fixed quote in week 1
  • Code, infra, runbook — yours
Plan a fixed build
DEDICATED TEAMmonthly

Hire dedicated Salesforce developers.

Embedded engineers in your Slack, your standups. Senior Apex and LWC engineers. Pause, resize, end with 30 days' notice.

$5k / eng / mo

PER ENGINEER

  • Same senior bar as fixed-scope
  • Embedded in your team
  • Founder-direct escalation
Hire dedicated Salesforce devs
ENGAGEMENTcustom

Strategic Salesforce partnership.

A long-term partner for Salesforce orgs — architecture, integration strategy, AppExchange development, hiring help.

custom

PROCUREMENT-FRIENDLY

  • Multi-quarter roadmap
  • Architecture & hiring partner
  • Procurement-friendly paper
Speak to the founder
FAQ

Sharp questions,
straight answers.

Flows vs Apex, Aura migration, governor limits — the questions we get on every Salesforce discovery call.
Flows for admin-maintainable automation — simple field updates, notifications, approvals. Apex when the logic is complex, needs bulk processing, or involves external callouts. Most orgs need both — the mistake is using one where the other belongs.
Yes for new development — LWC is faster, lighter, and Salesforce's direction going forward. Migrate existing Aura components when they need changes. No flag-day rewrite needed — LWC and Aura coexist cleanly.
Bulkified Apex from day one. SOQL in selectors, not loops. Batch Apex for large datasets. Test classes that assert behaviour at 200-record scale. Governor limits are a design constraint — not a surprise.
Yes. The engineers who write the RFC ship the code. No handoff mid-engagement. Direct access throughout.
Yes. We adapt to your automation framework, package structure, and deployment model. If something needs restructuring, we flag it in the RFC. If it works, we build on top of it.

Founder-direct

Tell us whatyou're building.

Thirty minutes with the founder. We'll bring a senior Salesforce developer, the relevant playbook, and a candid read on whether custom Salesforce development is the right call — or whether a different approach fits your CRM needs better.