Skip to main content

HTML5 development services,built for performance.

HTML5 development services shouldn't mean treating the platform as a fallback. Eight years running it in production: semantic markup search engines actually reward, Canvas and WebGL that don't drop frames, Web APIs that replace native app features without an app store in sight. The platform is more capable than most teams ever use — we use all of it.

  • Semantic HTML
  • Sub-1s LCP
  • Web APIs
  • Zero framework overhead

Why Entalogics for HTML5

Four things every HTML5
app actually needs.

Most teams hire an HTML5 development company expecting platform expertise and get a layer underneath their framework instead — something the bundler outputs and nobody reads. That's where performance, accessibility, and SEO get quietly destroyed.

Performance01

Sub-1s LCP, by construction.

Fonts preloaded, critical CSS inlined, non-essential scripts deferred, images properly sized with native lazy loading — no framework runtime standing between the browser and the content. HTML5 delivered correctly is the fastest frontend stack there is. Most teams just never deliver it correctly.

Component systems02

Web Components, not component soup.

Custom Elements, Shadow DOM, and the HTML Template element give you encapsulated, reusable components with zero runtime dependency. What we build works inside any framework, survives any future migration, and adds exactly zero kilobytes of third-party JavaScript to the bundle.

State03

Browser APIs, not a state library.

The History API handles routing. Local Storage and IndexedDB handle persistence. BroadcastChannel handles cross-tab coordination. The browser already ships a capable state layer that most teams replace with a 40kB library, simply because nobody taught them what the platform provides.

Type safety04

Typed Web APIs, no runtime surprises.

TypeScript's DOM typings are thorough, when they're actually used. Typed Custom Events, typed Web Component props, fetch responses validated at the boundary with Zod. A refactor touching the DOM layer lands cleanly because the compiler handles the boring half of the review.

When HTML5, when not

HTML5 is a tool.
Not a religion.

An honest decision matrix. We'll tell you on the first call whether vanilla HTML5 is right for your problem, or whether a framework earns its cost.

PICK HTML5 WHEN

  • Performance and SEO are the real constraints — content sites, landing pages, documentation
  • Low-powered devices or slow networks are real conditions, not edge cases — framework overhead actually shows up there
  • The build is an embeddable widget or Web Component that has to work inside any host application
  • Long-term maintenance matters, and zero framework-upgrade risk is worth more than convenience today

CONSIDER OTHERS WHEN

  • Complex interactive UI with dozens of interdependent components — React or Vue earns its overhead here
  • A large team building a long-lived SaaS product needs the coordination conventions a framework enforces
  • Real-time collaborative features are better served by a framework ecosystem's tooling for this exact problem

WE SAY NO WHEN

  • "Avoid frameworks, we heard they're slow." That's a rumor, not an architecture decision — we'll say so honestly.
  • "Build our SaaS dashboard in vanilla HTML5." We'll push back — the platform can do it, but the coordination cost at that complexity isn't worth paying.
  • "Two weeks, spec still being written." That ship has sailed.

What we build with HTML5

Six product surfaces.
One quality bar.

The shapes of HTML5 development we ship most often. Each slots cleanly into your existing stack if you already have one.

  • S01

    Marketing & growth surfaces

    High-traffic landing pages, content sites, documentation — semantic HTML5, structured data, edge-delivered, Lighthouse 100 by construction. The fastest route from content to an indexed, ranking page.

    HTML5VITESCHEMA.ORGVERCEL
  • S02

    Web Components & design systems

    Custom Elements built to the platform standard — framework-agnostic, Shadow DOM encapsulated, ARIA-compliant. Components that work in React today, and in whatever replaces React next.

    WEB COMPONENTSLITSTORYBOOKTOKENS-STUDIO
  • S03

    Canvas & WebGL experiences

    Data visualizations, interactive graphics, game-adjacent UIs — native Canvas 2D for charts and editors, WebGL for 3D and GPU-accelerated rendering, with no wrapper library sitting between your logic and the GPU.

    CANVAS APIWEBGLTHREE.JSPIXI.JS
  • S04

    Progressive Web Apps

    Service Workers, Web App Manifest, Background Sync, Push Notifications — a PWA that actually passes the installability criteria, works offline on the critical path, and loads in under two seconds on a 3G connection.

    SERVICE WORKERWORKBOXWEB APP MANIFESTVITE-PWA
  • S05

    Internal tooling

    The spreadsheet that became five spreadsheets — replaced with lightweight, zero-dependency internal tools that don't need a framework and don't quietly accumulate one over time.

    HTML5VITETYPESCRIPTTAILWIND
  • S06

    Embeddable widgets

    Third-party embeds, checkout widgets, comment systems, live chat — Shadow DOM isolation means the widget doesn't leak styles into the host page, and the host page can't break the widget either.

    WEB COMPONENTSSHADOW DOMVITETYPESCRIPT

The playbook

Patterns we
ship on repeat.

The HTML5 development patterns that show up on almost every engagement. Not invention — convention, applied carefully.

  • P01

    Semantic markup first

    The right element for the right job — article, nav, main, dialog, not div stacked all the way down. Semantic HTML is free SEO, free accessibility, and free document structure. Most teams throw all of it away without noticing.

  • P02

    Typed contracts

    Zod sits at every data boundary — API responses, form inputs, URL parameters, postMessage payloads. TypeScript's DOM typings run in strict mode. any never gets near the DOM.

  • P03

    Cache-first data

    The Service Worker caching strategy gets matched to how volatile the data actually is. Static assets sit at the edge. API responses use stale-while-revalidate where a little staleness is fine. The network becomes optional on the critical path.

  • P04

    Design tokens

    CSS custom properties act as the token layer — not screenshots, not hardcoded hex values. Light mode, dark mode, density, and brand variants all fall out of a single token file.

  • P05

    Visual + integration tests

    Playwright runs against real browser APIs, not a simulated DOM. Web Component interactions get tested. Accessibility assertions run in CI. The whole suite finishes in under five minutes.

  • P06

    Progressive enhancement

    Core functionality works with no JavaScript at all — interactivity gets layered on top of that, not required for it. Users on slow connections, screen readers, or locked-down corporate proxies get a working product instead of a blank screen.

Signature case

A marketing platform,
rebuilt from framework to platform..

A high-traffic B2C marketing platform on a legacy SPA — 5.8s LCP, a 1.6 MB JavaScript bundle for a site that was primarily content, and an SEO profile that hadn't recovered from a framework migration three years earlier. We rebuilt on semantic HTML5 with Vite, progressive enhancement, and edge delivery in 9 weeks. Without a content freeze.

Before

p75 LCP 5.8s · bundle 1.6 MB · Lighthouse SEO 61 · Core Web Vitals failing · 0 structured data

After

p75 LCP 0.78s · bundle 48 kB · Lighthouse SEO 100 · Core Web Vitals passing · full Schema.org coverage

  • p75 LCP improvement−87%
  • JavaScript bundle−97%
  • to fully migrated9wk
  • shipped regressions0

Engagement shape

Eight to ten weeks
to a measurable ship.

A typical HTML5 engagement, end-to-end. We migrate route by route — never flag-day.

  • W01

    Audit + RFC

    Two senior engineers go through the codebase — a bundle analysis, a render-blocking inventory, a semantic markup audit, a Core Web Vitals baseline, structured data gaps. Week one ends with a ranked, dollarized RFC, not a list of Lighthouse complaints.

  • W02–03

    Foundation + first route

    A semantic HTML baseline gets set, critical CSS gets inlined, a font-loading strategy gets built, one production route migrates start to finish. Core Web Vitals land in your actual Search Console, not a local Lighthouse run.

  • W04–08

    Migrate by route, not flag-day

    Every remaining route migrates one at a time, old and new coexisting behind a reverse proxy. Your content team keeps publishing — rebuilding the frontend was never going to require a freeze.

  • W09+

    Cleanup + handoff

    The old code gets deleted, the component library gets documented, Storybook gets set up for Web Components, Playwright covers integration tests. The runbook goes to your team, or we stay on retainer.

Stack

Tools we
Tools we reach
reach for for first.

Picked by problem, not by resume. Happy to slot into your stack — but greenfield, this is the default.

Platform
HTML5 · Web Components · Custom Elements · Shadow DOM · Service Workers
Build
Vite · esbuild · Rollup · PostCSS · Lightning CSS
Language
TypeScript (strict) · Zod · ESLint + biome
Styling
Tailwind · CSS Modules · vanilla-extract · CSS custom properties
Testing
Playwright · Vitest · Web Test Runner · Storybook · axe-core
Infra
Vercel · Cloudflare Workers · Netlify · AWS CloudFront · Datadog · Sentry

Engagement

Three ways
to work with us.

No hourly retainer billing for "thinking time." Every path is fixed-quote or transparently rated.

FIXED SCOPEone-off build

Ship an HTML5 product, end-to-end.

One product, scoped and priced once, built entirely by senior engineers. RFC to launch in 8–14 weeks.

$15k–$30k

FIXED SCOPE

  • Zero juniors on client work
  • Fixed quote in week 1
  • Code, infra, runbook — yours
Plan a fixed build
DEDICATED TEAMmonthly

Hire dedicated HTML5 engineers.

A pod of senior HTML5 engineers embedded in your Slack, your Linear, your standups. Resize or pause with 30 days' notice.

$5k / eng / mo

PER ENGINEER

  • Same senior bar as fixed-scope
  • Embedded in your team
  • Founder-direct escalation
Hire dedicated HTML5 devs
ENGAGEMENTcustom

Strategic HTML5 consulting partnership.

For product orgs that need more than delivery — a long-term HTML5 consulting partner: design system ownership, a performance program, hiring help.

custom

PROCUREMENT-FRIENDLY

  • Multi-quarter roadmap
  • Architecture & hiring partner
  • Procurement-friendly paper
Speak to the founder
FAQ

Sharp questions,
straight answers.

Framework vs. platform, Web Components, interactivity — the questions we get on every HTML5 discovery call.
When performance and SEO are the actual constraints. Content sites, landing pages, documentation, and embeddable widgets don't need a framework runtime — they need fast, semantic, well-structured HTML. If a page's job is to be found, loaded, and read, the platform beats every framework on those metrics by default.
For a shared design system, yes — often better. Custom Elements are framework-agnostic, so the same button component works in a React app, a Vue admin panel, and a static marketing site simultaneously. If components get consumed across multiple stacks, Web Components remove the "which framework version" problem entirely.
With the platform APIs most teams don't realize exist — Custom Events for component communication, the History API for routing, IndexedDB for persistence, BroadcastChannel for cross-tab state. For genuinely complex UI like a rich text editor or a drag-and-drop canvas, we reach for a focused library like Lit or Shoelace instead of a full framework.
Yes. Whoever writes the RFC is writing the production code — no handoff to a junior team after scoping, no account manager in the middle, direct access to the people doing the work throughout.
Yes. CSS Modules, BEM, Tailwind, vanilla-extract, and fully custom token systems have all come up before. We work inside your conventions instead of asking you to rewrite CSS that already works.

Founder-direct

Tell us whatyou're building.

Thirty minutes with the founder — a senior HTML5 engineer, the relevant playbook, and a candid read on whether the platform is the right tool, or a framework actually earns its keep here.