Skip to main content

Desktop Development Services,Done Native.

Most desktop software gets built by teams that treat it as a web app with a wrapper around it. That's how you end up with a 300MB installer, an auto-updater nobody tested, and a UI thread that freezes every time the app touches disk. We build desktop applications the way the platform actually demands — separate processes, typed communication between them, and a release pipeline that survives contact with three different operating systems.

  • Electron + Tauri
  • Cross-platform
  • Auto-update
  • Code-signed

Why Entalogics for desktop

What separates a working
desktop app from
a broken one.

We've taken over enough half-finished desktop projects to know the pattern. It's rarely the framework. It's four decisions nobody made on purpose.

Performance01

Nobody picked a memory budget, so the app just grew.

An unoptimized Electron build sits at 150-300MB of RAM doing nothing. A comparable Tauri build sits at 30-50MB. That gap isn't magic — it's the difference between shipping a full Chromium instance per window and not. We decide the memory budget before we pick the framework, then hold the line on it: windows load lazily, IPC calls get batched instead of chattering, and anything CPU-heavy comes off the main thread before it ships.

Architecture02

The main process and the renderer got treated as one program.

This is the single most common desktop bug pattern we see: someone puts a database call in the renderer because it was convenient that afternoon, and eighteen months later nobody can trace where state actually lives. We enforce the split from day one. Renderer draws pixels. Main process owns business logic, file access, and native calls. Everything crossing that boundary is typed, so a mismatch fails at compile time instead of showing up as a support ticket.

State03

The app assumed a network connection that isn't guaranteed.

Desktop users open your app expecting it to work on a plane, in a basement server room, or during an ISP outage. If your data layer was designed assuming a live connection, it will fail exactly when the user needs it most. We build local-first with SQLite as the source of truth, sync as an enhancement layered on top — not the other way around.

Type safety04

Type safety stopped at the process boundary.

It's common to see a codebase with perfect TypeScript in the renderer and completely untyped IPC calls connecting it to the backend. That boundary is exactly where bugs hide, because nothing catches a mismatched payload until a user triggers it in production. We type the IPC contract the same way we type everything else — Zod-validated, checked at build time, not discovered at 2am.

When desktop, when not

Not every product needs
a desktop app.

We say this on almost every first call, because it's true more often than people expect. Here's the actual test we use.

BUILD A DESKTOP APP WHEN

  • The product has to work with zero connectivity, not "mostly work" — offline is a hard requirement, not a stretch goal
  • File system access, a local database, or hardware integration is core to what the product does
  • Your users open this app first thing and keep it open all day — dock presence and system tray behavior are part of the experience
  • Data can't leave the device for compliance or sensitivity reasons

PICK ELECTRON WHEN

  • Your engineers already know React and TypeScript, and you want the shortest path from decision to shipped app
  • You need access to a native API or integration that only has a mature package in Electron's ecosystem
  • Every platform needs to behave identically, and you're willing to trade bundle size for that guarantee

PICK TAURI WHEN

  • A 10MB installer and 50MB of idle memory aren't nice-to-haves — they're contractual
  • Your threat model cares about attack surface, and shipping a full bundled browser runtime is a liability you'd rather not carry
  • Someone on the team can write Rust, or you're budgeting time to get there

WE SAY NO WHEN

  • The ask is "make it feel more serious" — that's a marketing goal, not an architecture requirement
  • Someone wants Electron wrapped around five form fields — that's a website, not a desktop app
  • The timeline is three weeks for three platforms — the math doesn't work, and we'll say so upfront

What we build on desktop

Desktop application development
services we deliver.

Six ways this work actually shows up for clients. Each one ends with something signed, updating automatically, and running in production on real machines.

  • S01

    Custom desktop application development

    A new desktop product, built from the architecture up. We settle the process boundary, the state model, and the update strategy before any feature work starts — because retrofitting those decisions later is where most desktop projects go sideways.

    ELECTRONTAURI 2REACTTYPESCRIPT
  • S02

    Cross-platform desktop application development

    Windows, macOS, and Linux from one codebase, released on the same cadence. We've seen too many "cross-platform" apps where Linux quietly falls three versions behind because nobody's testing it — we build the CI pipeline so that can't happen by accident.

    ELECTRONTAURIREACTVUE
  • S03

    Desktop software modernization

    An old WinForms or Java Swing app that still runs the business but hasn't been touched architecturally in a decade. We rebuild it on a modern stack without touching the business logic that actually works, moving screen by screen so the current version stays in production the whole time.

    TAURI 2RUSTREACTAUTO-UPDATE
  • S04

    Electron to Tauri migration

    For teams running Electron in production who've hit a wall on bundle size, memory, or startup time. We move the IPC layer, rewrite the Node backend in Rust, and port native modules to Tauri plugins — typically taking a 150MB app down under 15MB without a feature freeze.

    TAURI 2RUSTREACTAUTO-UPDATE
  • S05

    Desktop application UI/UX design

    A design pass built around how desktop software actually behaves — multiple windows, a system tray, keyboard-first workflows — instead of a responsive web layout dropped into a frame and called done.

    FIGMAREACTTAILWINDSHADCN/UI
  • S06

    Desktop application maintenance and support

    The part most vendors quietly drop after launch. Update pipelines drift, dependencies age out, memory creeps up release over release if nobody's watching. We keep watching.

    SENTRYELECTRON-BUILDERTAURI CLIGITHUB ACTIONS

The playbook

What we build into every
desktop engagement.

Not experimental — these are the decisions that show up on nearly every project we take on, because they're the ones that matter.

  • P01

    The IPC boundary is typed, not trusted.

    Zod schemas validate every message crossing between main and renderer. An untyped `ipcRenderer.send` doesn't survive review — it gets flagged before merge, not found in a crash report.

  • P02

    Auto-update gets tested like a feature, because it is one.

    Signed builds, delta updates, and a rollback path if a release goes bad. This runs through CI on every release, so "the updater silently broke for 20% of users" isn't a sentence we say twice.

  • P03

    All three platforms get signed in the same pipeline.

    macOS notarization, Windows Authenticode, Linux AppImage signing — one CI job, not three manual steps someone has to remember on release day.

  • P04

    SQLite is the source of truth, not a cache.

    better-sqlite3 for Electron, Tauri's SQL plugin for Tauri. The app is fully functional offline; sync happens when the network shows up, and conflict resolution is decided before launch, not after the first support ticket about lost data.

  • P05

    The renderer can't reach the OS directly.

    Context Bridge in Electron, a command allowlist in Tauri. No Node access from the frontend, no arbitrary shell calls reachable from a compromised renderer. Small attack surface by construction.

  • P06

    Multiple windows means multiple lifecycles, managed on purpose.

    Settings panels, detached views, secondary windows — each one releases memory on close and syncs state through IPC instead of a global object nobody remembers writing.

Signature case

A developer tool,
migrated from Electron to Tauri.

A B2B database GUI on Electron — 180MB bundle, 340MB memory at idle, 6-second cold start on Windows, and auto-update that failed silently for 20% of users. Migrated to Tauri 2 with Rust backend in 9 weeks. Bundle dropped to 12MB. Memory to 45MB. Auto-update now works for everyone.

Before

Electron · 180MB bundle · 340MB idle memory · 6s cold start · auto-update 80% success

After

Tauri 2 · 12MB bundle · 45MB idle memory · 1.2s cold start · auto-update 100% success

  • Bundle size−93%
  • Idle memory−87%
  • To fully migrated9wk
  • Shipped regressions0

Industries we serve

Where desktop still
beats the browser.

A few sectors keep coming back to us for the same reason — a browser tab can't offer what their workflow actually needs.

  • Healthcare
  • Finance & Fintech
  • Logistics & Manufacturing
  • Enterprise & Internal Tools
  • Developer Tools
  • Media & Creative

Engagement shape

What eight to ten weeks
actually looks like.

Not a waterfall plan that reveals problems in week nine. Testers see signed builds from week two onward.

  • W01

    Audit + RFC

    Two senior engineers go through the codebase or the spec — bundle size, memory profile, IPC architecture, update pipeline. You get a ranked plan with real numbers attached, not a list of concerns.

  • W02–03

    Foundation + first window

    The framework choice gets locked in, IPC gets typed, code-signing gets wired into CI, and one real window ships end-to-end. You're holding a signed build on all three platforms by the end of week three.

  • W04–08

    Feature by feature

    Each additional window or feature goes out behind a flag, with a signed beta release every week. Nothing waits for a big-bang release at the end.

  • W09+

    Release + handoff

    Signed production builds for Windows, macOS, and Linux. Auto-update confirmed working in the wild, not just in a test environment. You get the runbook, or we stay on for ongoing maintenance.

Stack

Tools we
Tools we reach
reach for for first.

Our default desktop development stack — picked for production, not quick-start templates.

Framework
Electron · Tauri 2 · Neutralinojs
Language
TypeScript (strict) · Rust · Zod
Data
better-sqlite3 · Tauri SQL · Keytar · electron-store
UI
React · Vue · Tailwind · shadcn/ui
Testing
Playwright · Spectron · Vitest · Tauri test utils
Infra
electron-builder · Tauri CLI · GitHub Actions · Sentry

Engagement

Three ways to hire
desktop developers
at Entalogics.

No hourly billing for time spent thinking. Every arrangement below is either a fixed quote or a transparent monthly rate.

FIXED SCOPEone-off build

Ship a desktop app, end to end.

A fixed scope, a fixed price, and a team with no juniors rotating through client work. RFC to signed release across all three platforms, typically 8-14 weeks.

FIXED SCOPE

  • Zero juniors on client work
  • Fixed quote in week 1
  • Code, infra, runbook — yours
Plan a fixed build
DEDICATED TEAMmonthly

Hire dedicated desktop developers.

Senior Electron or Tauri engineers who join your Slack and your standups like they're part of the team, because for the length of the engagement, they are. Scale up, pause, or step away with 30 days' notice.

PER ENGINEER

  • Same senior bar as fixed-scope
  • Embedded in your team
  • Founder-direct escalation
Hire dedicated desktop developers
ENGAGEMENTcustom

Strategic desktop development partnership.

For teams that need a standing desktop architecture partner, not a one-off project — covering migration planning, update infrastructure, and hiring support across quarters.

PROCUREMENT-FRIENDLY

  • Multi-quarter roadmap
  • Architecture and hiring partner
  • Procurement-friendly paper
Speak to the founder
FAQ

Questions we get on almost
every desktop call.

Framework choice, migration, cost, timeline — in roughly the order people actually ask.
Start with your team's language. If they know Rust or are willing to learn it, and bundle size or memory is a hard constraint, Tauri wins on numbers alone — 10MB versus 150MB isn't a rounding error. If your team is React-and-TypeScript-only and you need access to Electron's much larger package ecosystem, that's the faster path to a working product. For most greenfield builds in 2026, we lean Tauri by default and only reach for Electron when there's a specific reason to.
A web app needs a live connection and lives inside someone else's browser tab. A desktop app is yours — it runs when there's no internet, reads and writes files directly, and can talk to hardware a browser sandbox will never let you touch. If none of that matters to your product, building desktop is probably solving a problem you don't have.
Yes, and we don't treat it as a rewrite. The UI mostly survives the move; what changes is the backend (Node to Rust) and the IPC layer. Native modules get ported to Tauri plugins one at a time. Most of these migrations land in 8-12 weeks, and the app keeps shipping releases the entire time.
It depends on how many platforms, how much legacy code you're carrying, and whether you're migrating or building fresh. We don't guess at this on a sales call — the week-one audit gives us the real numbers, and you get a fixed quote off that, not a range that creeps up every sprint.
Yes. Whoever writes the RFC in week one is still writing code in week ten. We don't hand projects off partway through to a different team, and there's no account manager standing between you and the people actually building it.

Founder-direct

Tell us whatyou're building.

Thirty minutes with the founder gets you a senior desktop engineer in the room, the playbook that's relevant to your case, and an honest read on whether desktop is even the right call — some of these conversations end with us recommending a PWA instead.